Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies
Scott B. MacKenzie and
Philip M. Podsakoff
Journal of Retailing, 2012, vol. 88, issue 4, 542-555
There is a great deal of evidence that method bias influences item validities, item reliabilities, and the covariation between latent constructs. In this paper, we identify a series of factors that may cause method bias by undermining the capabilities of the respondent, making the task of responding accurately more difficult, decreasing the motivation to respond accurately, and making it easier for respondents to satisfice. In addition, we discuss the psychological mechanisms through which these factors produce their biasing effects and propose several procedural remedies that counterbalance or offset each of these specific effects. We hope that this discussion will help researchers anticipate when method bias is likely to be a problem and provide ideas about how to avoid it through the careful design of a study.
Keywords: “Research Dialog” on common method bias; Research methods in retailing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (19) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jouret:v:88:y:2012:i:4:p:542-555
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Retailing is currently edited by A. Roggeveen
More articles in Journal of Retailing from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().