 Is $0 Better than Free? Consumer Response to “$0” versus “Free” Framing of a Free PromotionJieun Koo and Kwanho Suk Journal of Retailing, 2020, vol. 96, issue 3, 383-396 Abstract: This research explores the framing effect of free promotions on consumer responses. Specifically, the same free promotion can be presented as “free” (e.g., “Get Product X for Free”) or “$0” (e.g., “Get Product X for $0”). This study examines whether such presentations affect consumer preference for promotions. Results of ten experiments, including a field study, demonstrate that a free promotion is evaluated more favorably when presented as “$0” than “free.” This framing effect occurs because of the differential focus on the benefits of free promotions. The “$0” frame leads consumers to focus more on the cost-saving benefit of a free promotion, whereby people perceive that they save the entire cost of a free offer because of the promotion. By contrast, the “free” frame leads consumers to focus on obtaining a free offer itself. Thus, people perceive that the benefit of a promotion is the certain gain of the free offer. Given that the value associated with avoiding loss (i.e., cost) is greater than the value of an equivalent gain, $0 promotions are evaluated more favorably. Keywords: Attentional shift; Framing; Free promotion; Loss aversion; Pricing (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jouret:v:96:y:2020:i:3:p:383-396 DOI: 10.1016/j.jretai.2019.11.006 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Retailing is currently edited by A. Roggeveen More articles in Journal of Retailing from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.