Less social health insurance, more private supplementary insurance? Empirical evidence from Germany
Boris Augurzky () and
Harald Tauchmann ()
Journal of Policy Modeling, 2011, vol. 33, issue 3, 470-480
Based on individual level data from Germany, we analyze the effect of changes in the compulsory benefit package of the social health insurance on the demand for supplementary private insurance, employing a difference-in-differences approach. The focus is on the exclusion of dental prostheses from the benefit package in 1997 and its re-inclusion in 1999. Individuals born prior to 1979 serve as control group because only the young were affected by the reform. No significant effect on the demand for supplementary health insurance is found. Thus, the notion of clients making informed choices about their health insurances' coverage is not supported.
Keywords: Supplementary; private; health; insurance; Personal; responsibility; Dental; prostheses; Difference-in-differences (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: Less Social Health Insurance – More Private Supplementary Insurance? – Empirical Evidence from Germany (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jpolmo:v:33:y:2011:i:3:p:470-480
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Policy Modeling is currently edited by A. M. Costa
More articles in Journal of Policy Modeling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().