How much is too much: Does the size of income support transfers affect labor supply?
Silvio Daidone () and
Journal of Policy Modeling, 2019, vol. 41, issue 1, 179-196
Cash transfer programs pursue mainly protective objectives, but can also impact rural livelihoods by inducing investments in productive activities and changing household labor allocation. We adopt a continuous treatment approach to quantify how households’ labor supply responds to transfer size. We find a shift from paid labor to own farm labor and find that the transfer size is well within a level that would have disincentive effects on time spent on own farm activities. The switch from paid to own farm labor occurs at lower levels of transfers for labor-constrained households, and at higher levels for non-labor constrained households.
Keywords: Cash transfers; Labor supply; Continuous treatment approach; IPW-regression (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C21 J22 H24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jpolmo:v:41:y:2019:i:1:p:179-196
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Policy Modeling is currently edited by A. M. Costa
More articles in Journal of Policy Modeling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().