The evolution of the natural resource curse thesis: A critical literature survey
Ramez Badeeb (),
Hooi Hooi Lean () and
Jeremy Clark ()
Resources Policy, 2017, vol. 51, issue C, 123-134
This paper surveys the natural resource curse. We review the mechanisms through which resource wealth might slow economic growth, and the empirical studies that test for an effect overall, or on factors associated with growth. We include more recent studies suggesting the resource curse reflects only empirical misspecification. After reflecting on this conflicting evidence, and the findings of other recent surveys, we argue the evidence that resource dependence negatively affects growth remains convincing, particularly working through factors closely associated with growth in developing countries. Recent contrarian studies demonstrate that future research should better address endogeneity of dependence measures, and expand the years of study and range of empirical methodologies used.
Keywords: O13; O47; Q32; Q33; Natural resource curse; Natural resource dependence; Natural resource abundance; Economic growth; Literature survey (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (23) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: The Evolution of the Natural Resource Curse Thesis: A Critical Literature Survey (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:51:y:2017:i:c:p:123-134
Access Statistics for this article
Resources Policy is currently edited by R. G. Eggert
More articles in Resources Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().