When are ghettos bad? Lessons from immigrant segregation in the United States
David Cutler,
Edward L. Glaeser and
Jacob Vigdor
Journal of Urban Economics, 2008, vol. 63, issue 3, 759-774
Abstract:
Recent studies provide conflicting evidence on the connection between ethnic or racial neighborhood segregation and outcomes. Some studies find that residence in an enclave is beneficial, some reach the opposite conclusion, and still others imply that any relationship is small. One hypothesis is that studies differ because the impact of segregation varies across groups, perhaps because its impact is more benign for better-educated groups. This paper presents new evidence on this hypothesis using data on first-generation immigrants in the United States. We confront the endogenous selection into residential enclaves and find that selection into enclave neighborhoods is on balance negative. Correcting for this selection produces positive mean effects of segregation, and a positive correlation between group average human capital and the impact of segregation.
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (141)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094-1190(07)00094-0
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: When Are Ghettos Bad? Lessons from Immigrant Segregation In the United States (2008) 
Working Paper: When Are Ghettos Bad? Lessons from Immigrant Segregation in the United States (2007) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:juecon:v:63:y:2008:i:3:p:759-774
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Urban Economics is currently edited by S.S. Rosenthal and W.C. Strange
More articles in Journal of Urban Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().