When Are Ghettos Bad? Lessons from Immigrant Segregation In the United States

Jacob Vigdor, Edward Glaeser and David Cutler

Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics

Abstract: Recent studies provide conflicting evidence on the connection between ethnic or racial neighborhood segregation and outcomes. Some studies find that residence in an enclave is beneficial, some reach the opposite conclusion, and still others imply that any relationship is small. One hypothesis is that studies differ because the impact of segregation varies across groups, perhaps because its impact is more benign for better-educated groups. This paper presents new evidence on this hypothesis using data on first-generation immigrants in the United States. We confront the endogenous selection into residential enclaves and find that selection into enclave neighborhoods is on balance negative. Correcting for this selection produces positive mean effects of segregation, and a positive correlation between group average human capital and the impact of segregation.

Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (140)

Published in Journal of Urban Economics

Downloads: (external link)
http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/2666726/cutler_ghettos.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: When are ghettos bad? Lessons from immigrant segregation in the United States (2008)
Working Paper: When Are Ghettos Bad? Lessons from Immigrant Segregation in the United States (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hrv:faseco:2666726

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Office for Scholarly Communication ().