Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations?
A. Briant,
Pierre-Philippe Combes and
Miren Lafourcade
Journal of Urban Economics, 2010, vol. 67, issue 3, 287-302
Abstract:
This paper evaluates, in the context of economic geography estimates, the magnitude of the distortions arising from the choice of a specific zoning system, which is also known as the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP). We undertake three standard economic geography exercises (the analysis of spatial concentration, agglomeration economies, and trade determinants), using various French zoning systems differentiated according to the size and shape of their spatial units. While size might matter, especially when the dependent variable of a regression is not aggregated in the same way as the explanatory variables and/or the zoning system involves large spatial units, shape does so much less. In any case, both dimensions are of secondary importance compared to specification issues.
Keywords: MAUP; Concentration; Agglomeration; Wage; equations; Gravity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (191)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094-1190(09)00081-3
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations? (2010)
Working Paper: Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations? (2010)
Working Paper: Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations? (2010)
Working Paper: Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations? (2010)
Working Paper: Dots to Boxes: Do the Size and Shape of Spatial Units Jeopardize Economic Geography Estimations? (2008) 
Working Paper: DOTS TO BOXES: DO THE SIZE AND SHAPE OF SPATIAL UNITS JEOPARDIZE ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY ESTIMATIONS? (2008) 
Working Paper: Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations? (2008) 
Working Paper: DOTS TO BOXES: DO THE SIZE AND SHAPE OF SPATIAL UNITS JEOPARDIZE ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY ESTIMATIONS? (2008) 
Working Paper: Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations? (2008) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:juecon:v:67:y:2010:i:3:p:287-302
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Urban Economics is currently edited by S.S. Rosenthal and W.C. Strange
More articles in Journal of Urban Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().