Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations?

A. Briant, Pierre-Philippe Combes and Miren Lafourcade

Post-Print from HAL

Date: 2010-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Published in Journal of Urban Economics, 2010, 67 (3), pp.287-302. ⟨10.1016/j.jue.2009.09.014⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations? (2010)
Working Paper: Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations? (2010)
Working Paper: Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations? (2010)
Working Paper: Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations? (2010)
Working Paper: Dots to Boxes: Do the Size and Shape of Spatial Units Jeopardize Economic Geography Estimations? (2008)
Working Paper: DOTS TO BOXES: DO THE SIZE AND SHAPE OF SPATIAL UNITS JEOPARDIZE ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY ESTIMATIONS? (2008)
Working Paper: Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations? (2008)
Working Paper: DOTS TO BOXES: DO THE SIZE AND SHAPE OF SPATIAL UNITS JEOPARDIZE ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY ESTIMATIONS? (2008)
Working Paper: Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations? (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04246924

DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2009.09.014

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().