Noncompliance and the effects of the minimum wage on hours and welfare in competitive labor markets

Leif Danziger ()

Labour Economics, 2009, vol. 16, issue 6, 625-630

Abstract: This paper shows that increases in the minimum wage rate can have ambiguous effects on the working hours and welfare of employed workers in competitive labor markets. The reason is that employers may not comply with the minimum wage legislation and instead pay a lower subminimum wage rate. If workers are risk neutral, we prove that working hours and welfare are invariant to the minimum wage rate. If workers are risk averse and imprudent (which is the empirically likely case), then working hours decrease with the minimum wage rate, while their welfare may increase.

Keywords: Noncompliance; Minimum; wage; Working; hours; Welfare; Competitive; labor; markets (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927-5371(09)00092-X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Noncompliance and the Effects of the Minimum Wage on Hours and Welfare in Competitive Labor Markets (2009)
Working Paper: Noncompliance and the Effects of the Minimum Wage on Hours and Welfare in Competitive Labor Markets (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:labeco:v:16:y:2009:i:6:p:625-630

Access Statistics for this article

Labour Economics is currently edited by A. Ichino

More articles in Labour Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().