Strategic behavior across gender: A comparison of female and male expert chess players

Christer Gerdes and Patrik Gränsmark

Labour Economics, 2010, vol. 17, issue 5, 766-775

Abstract: This paper aims to measure differences in risk behavior among expert chess players. The study employs a panel data set on international chess with 1.4 million games recorded over a period of 11 years. The structure of the data set allows us to use individual fixed-effect estimations to control for aspects such as innate ability as well as other characteristics of the players. Most notably, the data contains an objective measure of individual playing strength, the so-called Elo rating. In line with previous research, we find that women are more risk-averse than men. A novel finding is that men choose more aggressive strategies when playing against female opponents even though such strategies reduce their winning probability.

Keywords: Risk; aversion; Competitiveness; Gender; Culture; Mixed-sex; competition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (64)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927-5371(10)00058-8
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Strategic Behavior across Gender: A Comparison of Female and Male Expert Chess Players (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:labeco:v:17:y:2010:i:5:p:766-775

Access Statistics for this article

Labour Economics is currently edited by A. Ichino

More articles in Labour Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().