EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Estimating the returns to schooling: Implications from a dynamic discrete choice model

Suqin Ge

Labour Economics, 2013, vol. 20, issue C, 92-105

Abstract: This paper assesses the applicability of a dynamic discrete choice model in accounting for the observed ordinary least squares (OLS) and instrumental variable (IV) estimates of the Mincer equation parameter on returns to schooling. A dynamic model of schooling and employment choices is estimated and used to simulate educational attainment, employment history, and wages. Estimations of the Mincer wage equation using simulated data appear to validate the model. Ability selection is found to be the major source of bias in the OLS estimates of schooling returns. Although the IV estimates lie within the support of true returns to schooling if a strong and strictly exogenous instrument is used and if dynamic employment selection is controlled, these conditions may be easily violated in practice.

Keywords: Returns to schooling; Instrumental variable (IV); Ordinary least squares (OLS); Dynamic discrete choice model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C1 C3 I2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537112001121
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:labeco:v:20:y:2013:i:c:p:92-105

DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2012.11.004

Access Statistics for this article

Labour Economics is currently edited by A. Ichino

More articles in Labour Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-27
Handle: RePEc:eee:labeco:v:20:y:2013:i:c:p:92-105