Labor demand research: Toward a better match between better theory and better data

John Addison, Pedro Portugal () and Jose Varejao ()

Labour Economics, 2014, vol. 30, issue C, 4-11

Abstract: At first blush, most advances in labor demand were achieved by the late 1980s. Since then progress might appear to have stalled. We argue to the contrary that significant progress has been made in understanding labor market frictions and imperfections, and in modeling search behavior and heterogeneous preferences. Perhaps most notable have been the improvements in data, in the form of longitudinal matched employer–employee data, and in techniques and algorithms (e.g. for solving heterogeneous parameter models). In short, the Cinderella status of the field is frankly overdrawn. Nevertheless, a chief lacuna remains the need for a better match between theory and data. This paper provides a critical albeit eclectic assessment of these developments, along the dimensions of the static and dynamic theory of labor demand, wage formation, and estimation, noting advances and limitations. As is conventional, somewhat greater emphasis is placed on the latter.

Keywords: Labor demand; Input heterogeneity; Labor adjustment costs; Wage and employment determination; Multiple fixed effects; Establishment-level functions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D4 J23 J3 J4 J5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (27)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092753711400075X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Labour Demand Research: Towards a Better Match between Better Theory and Better Data (2014)
Working Paper: Labour Demand Research: Towards a Better Match between Better Theory and Better Data (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:labeco:v:30:y:2014:i:c:p:4-11

DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2014.06.002

Access Statistics for this article

Labour Economics is currently edited by A. Ichino

More articles in Labour Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().