The consumption response to temporary layoffs and hours losses

Nicolas Lepage-Saucier

Labour Economics, 2016, vol. 41, issue C, 177-193

Abstract: This paper examines how labor market displacement affects the consumption of American households using the US Current Population Survey (CPS). Specifically, I follow workers who experience temporary layoffs with or without a known recall date and workers who face involuntary reduction of work hours. Layoffs without recall date reduce spending on food by 15.2%, temporary layoffs with recall date reduce spending on food by 13%, while workers on involuntary hours reduction do not change food expenditure. The results are consistent with responses to unexpected shocks, supporting the permanent income hypothesis. Even though hours reductions significantly lower annual income, they have only a slight effect on lifetime income. This work highlights how different types of displacement trigger consumption responses via different channels.

Keywords: Consumption; Work hours; Layoffs; Work sharing; Propensity score matching (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E2 J5 J6 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537116300525
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:labeco:v:41:y:2016:i:c:p:177-193

DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2016.05.029

Access Statistics for this article

Labour Economics is currently edited by A. Ichino

More articles in Labour Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().