Guessing the beliefs
Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2009, vol. 45, issue 12, 846-853
A decision maker facing Knightian uncertainty is about to tell if he prefers an act X or Y. Two agents try to guess what he is going to do. All of them have preferences that achieve a separation of utility from beliefs. The only thing that the two agents do not know is the beliefs, so they evaluate them. We give a definition of "guessing better" and deal with its implications. We study particular cases as subjective expected utility and Choquet expected utility.
Keywords: Separation; of; utility; and; beliefs; Non-additive; expected; utility; Choquet; expected; utility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:mateco:v:45:y:2009:i:12:p:846-853
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Mathematical Economics is currently edited by Atsushi (A.) Kajii
More articles in Journal of Mathematical Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().