EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A preference foundation for constant loss aversion

Hans Peters

Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2012, vol. 48, issue 1, 21-25

Abstract: Following prospect theory and in particular the concept of loss aversion, introduced by Kahneman and Tversky (1979), we consider decision making under risk in which the decision maker’s preferences depend on a reference outcome. An outcome below this reference outcome is regarded as resulting from a loss: a loss decreases the decision maker’s basic utility more than a comparable gain increases this utility. An elegant and simple way to model this phenomenon was proposed by Shalev (2002): the utility of an outcome below the reference outcome is obtained from the basic utility by subtracting a multiple of the loss in basic utility: this multiple, the loss aversion coefficient, is constant across different reference outcomes. We provide a preference foundation for this loss aversion model.

Keywords: Decision making under risk; Reference outcome; Loss aversion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304406811001303
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: A preference foundation for constant loss aversion (2010) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:mateco:v:48:y:2012:i:1:p:21-25

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmateco.2011.11.003

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Mathematical Economics is currently edited by Atsushi (A.) Kajii

More articles in Journal of Mathematical Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2024-06-09
Handle: RePEc:eee:mateco:v:48:y:2012:i:1:p:21-25