A dual approach to ambiguity aversion
Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2017, vol. 71, issue C, 104-118
In the present paper, the assumption of monotonicity of Anscombe and Aumann (1963) is replaced by an assumption of monotonicity with respect to first-order stochastic dominance. This yields a representation result where ambiguous distributions of objective beliefs are first aggregated into “equivalent unambiguous beliefs” and then risk preferences are used to compute the utility of these equivalent unambiguous beliefs. Such an approach makes it possible to disentangle uncertainty aversion, related to the processing of information, from risk aversion, related to the evaluation of the equivalent unambiguous beliefs. An application to portfolio choice shows the tractability of the framework and its intuitive appeal.
Keywords: Ambiguity aversion; First-order stochastic dominance; Separability; Comonotonic sure-thing principle; Rank-dependent utility; Portfolio choice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:mateco:v:71:y:2017:i:c:p:104-118
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Mathematical Economics is currently edited by Atsushi (A.) Kajii
More articles in Journal of Mathematical Economics from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Dana Niculescu ().