# Strategic vote trading under complete information

*Dimitrios Xefteris* and
*Nicholas Ziros*

*Journal of Mathematical Economics*, 2018, vol. 78, issue C, 52-58

**Abstract:**
We study two-party elections considering that: (a) prior to the voting stage voters are free to trade votes for money according to the rules of the Shapley–Shubik strategic market games; and (b) voters’ preferences – both ordinal rankings and cardinal intensities – arepublic information. While under plurality rule no trade occurs, under a power-sharing system (voters’ utilities are proportionally increasing in the vote share of their favorite party) full trade is always an equilibrium (two voters – the strongest supporter of each party – buy the votes of all others). Notably, this equilibrium implements proportional justice with respect to the two buyers: the ratio of the parties’ vote shares is equal to the ratio of the preference intensities of the two most opposing voters.

**Keywords:** Vote trading; Complete information; Strategic market games; Power sharing; Proportional justice (search for similar items in EconPapers)

**Date:** 2018

**References:** View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc

**Citations:** Track citations by RSS feed

**Downloads:** (external link)

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304406818300867

Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

**Related works:**

Working Paper: Strategic vote trading under complete information (2017)

This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

**Export reference:** BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text

**Persistent link:** https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:mateco:v:78:y:2018:i:c:p:52-58

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Mathematical Economics is currently edited by *Atsushi (A.) Kajii*

More articles in Journal of Mathematical Economics from Elsevier

Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().