Anomalies and market (dis)integration
Jaewon Choi and
Journal of Monetary Economics, 2018, vol. 100, issue C, 16-34
If equity and corporate bond markets are integrated, risk premia in one market should appear in the other, and their magnitudes should be consistent with each other. We use this powerful insight to test market integration. Some variables (e.g., profitability and net issuance) fail to explain bond returns, and for others (e.g., investment and momentum) bond return premia are too large compared with their loadings, or hedge ratios, on equity returns of the same firms. The risk premia of standard factors tend to differ between the two markets. Market integration weakens when noisy investor demand and short-sale impediments are stronger.
Keywords: Market integration; Credit risk; Hedge ratio; Cross-sectional corporate bond returns (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G12 G12 G13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:moneco:v:100:y:2018:i:c:p:16-34
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Monetary Economics is currently edited by R. G. King and C. I. Plosser
More articles in Journal of Monetary Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().