Money, intermediation, and banking

David Andolfatto () and Ed Nosal

Journal of Monetary Economics, 2009, vol. 56, issue 3, 289-294

Abstract: The business of money creation is conceptually distinct from that of intermediation. Yet, these two activities are frequently--but not always--combined together in the form of a banking system. We develop a simple model to examine the question: When is banking essential? There is a role for money due to a lack of record-keeping and a role for intermediation due to the existence of private information: both money and intermediation are essential. When monitoring costs associated with intermediation are sufficiently low, the two activities can be separated from one another. However, when monitoring costs are sufficiently high, a banking system that combines these two activities is essential.

Keywords: Money; Intermediation; Banking (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304-3932(08)00180-3
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Money, Intermediation, and Banking (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:moneco:v:56:y:2009:i:3:p:289-294

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Monetary Economics is currently edited by R. G. King and C. I. Plosser

More articles in Journal of Monetary Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().