Is newer better? Penn World Table Revisions and their impact on growth estimates

Simon Johnson, William Larson, Chris Papageorgiou () and Arvind Subramanian

Journal of Monetary Economics, 2013, vol. 60, issue 2, 255-274

Abstract: This paper sheds light on two problems in the Penn World Table (PWT) GDP estimates. First, we show that these estimates vary substantially across different versions of the PWT despite being derived from very similar underlying data and using almost identical methodologies; that the methodology deployed to estimate growth rates leads to systematic variability, which is greater: at higher data frequencies, for smaller countries, and the farther the estimate from the benchmark year. Moreover, this variability matters for the cross-country growth literature. While growth studies that use low frequency data remain robust to data revisions, studies that use annual data are less robust. Second, the PWT methodology leads to GDP estimates that are not valued at purchasing power parity (PPP) prices. This is surprising because the raison d’être of the PWT is to adjust national estimates of GDP by valuing output at common international (purchasing power parity [PPP]) prices so that the resulting PPP-adjusted estimates of GDP are comparable across countries. We propose an approach to address these two problems of variability and valuation.

Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (126)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304393212001377
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Is Newer Better? Penn World Table Revisions and Their Impact on Growth Estimates (2009)
Working Paper: Is Newer Better? Penn World Table Revisions and Their Impact on Growth Estimates (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:moneco:v:60:y:2013:i:2:p:255-274

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2012.10.022

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Monetary Economics is currently edited by R. G. King and C. I. Plosser

More articles in Journal of Monetary Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().