What are the best sample sizes for the Xbar and CUSUM charts?
Zhang Wu,
Mei Yang,
Michael B.C. Khoo and
Philippe Castagliola
International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, vol. 131, issue 2, 650-662
Abstract:
The and CUSUM control charts are used most widely for monitoring the mean of a quality characteristic x. This article studies the sample sizes and nCUSUM of these two charts in the domain of statistical design. However, the study takes the important sampling inspection cost (including the variable and fixed cost components) into consideration. The chart performance will be measured by a weighted average ATS (Average Time to Signal). There are two interesting findings based on the results of this study: (1) The chart becomes more statistically effective for detecting mean shifts when the fixed sampling cost cannot be neglected and/or when the mean shift range is small. If and nCUSUM are set as 4 and 1, respectively, based on some conventional wisdom, the simple chart often outperforms the more complicated CUSUM chart from an overall viewpoint. (2) Under all circumstances, the overall statistical performance of both charts can be improved, or significantly improved, by the optimization design. The optimal values of and nCUSUM depend on the ratio between the fixed and variable sampling costs, the range of the mean shift, and the in-control Average Time to Signal. For the general cases, the best sample sizes are or 4, and nCUSUM=2 or 3.
Keywords: Statistical; process; control; Control; chart; Sampling; cost; Optimization; design; Quadratic; loss; function (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(11)00067-3
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:proeco:v:131:y:2011:i:2:p:650-662
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Production Economics is currently edited by Stefan Minner
More articles in International Journal of Production Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().