Cross-training policies in field services
P.J. Colen and
M.R. Lambrecht
International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, vol. 138, issue 1, 76-88
Abstract:
To evaluate the outcomes of deploying technicians dedicated to preventive maintenance, instead of fully cross-trained technicians, this simulation study assesses field service operations of a company selling maintenance services. Comprehensive service contracts render the maintenance demand experienced by the field service organization dependent on the cross-training decision. The optimal cross-training policy and the factors that influence this policy are determined, taking into account the effect on the demand for maintenance. Evidence shows that full cross-training might be especially beneficial in a field service setting. In many of the tested scenarios, full cross-training is optimal or the optimal fraction of the workforce being dedicated is low. The results reveal that, in general, a higher workload, more reliable machines, a higher maintenance frequency, and a higher contract coverage increase the benefits of deploying dedicated technicians.
Keywords: Simulation; Cross-training; Field service; Maintenance; Service contracts (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527312000990
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:proeco:v:138:y:2012:i:1:p:76-88
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.003
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Production Economics is currently edited by Stefan Minner
More articles in International Journal of Production Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().