Process performance improvement in justice organizations—Pitfalls of performance measurement
Petra Pekkanen and
Petri Niemi
International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, vol. 143, issue 2, 605-611
Abstract:
The paper focuses on the problems and pitfalls of process performance measurement in justice organizations and the possible negative on process performance. The characteristics and pitfalls of process performance measurement in justice organizations are analyzed with two case studies conducted in two Finnish courts. The empirical findings are compared to the attributes of a good performance measurement system adopted from the literature. It is found that the main areas needing attention in judicial performance measurement are: understanding the causal relationships, improving the informativeness of used measures, improving the role of the measures as communication devices, and using the measures as incentives for improvement. On the basis of these findings, some potential solutions for improving performance measurement in public sector professional organizations are offered.
Keywords: Performance measurement; Professional organization; Public sector; Justice organization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527312003404
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:proeco:v:143:y:2013:i:2:p:605-611
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.08.009
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Production Economics is currently edited by Stefan Minner
More articles in International Journal of Production Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().