Do cap-and-trade policies drive environmental and social goals in supply chains: Strategic decisions, collaboration, and contract choices

Mithu Rani Kuiti, Debabrata Ghosh, Preetam Basu and Arnab Bisi

International Journal of Production Economics, 2020, vol. 223, issue C

Abstract: This paper studies a manufacturer-retailer channel selling complementary green products under the cap-and-trade policy and analyzes strategic decisions in these settings. While the manufacturer faces government mandated cap-and-trade norm, the retailer invests in corporate social responsibility through selling of green products. In this study, we conduct a comparative analysis of the players’ decisions under centralized and decentralized scenarios and explore the role of cap-and-trade policy in influencing decision outcomes. Further, three contracts are proposed to improve channel performance, namely, the two-part tariff, corporate social responsibility (CSR) effort sharing, and green cost sharing contracts. The results show that collaboration among the supply chain players through contracts supports green initiatives vis-à-vis the decentralized channel. However, given a choice of contracts, the channel prefers those contracts from which the manufacturer accrues direct benefits because he incurs greening costs. The results further demonstrate that carbon markets play an important role in influencing green initiatives, particularly, under high trading prices, where manufacturers are incentivized to improve their product offerings. Further, the cap-and-trade policy influences retailers to work toward building higher reputation and brand value through investments in higher CSR effort. From a retail price perspective, we find that consumers benefit under higher trading prices because the benefits of carbon surplus and higher revenues of the supply chain players result in lowering the prices for consumers. However, it is in contrast to studies on the decentralized channel outcomes or environmental taxation because in both the scenarios, greening or CSR costs get transferred to the consumers in the form of higher prices.

Keywords: Green supply chain; Cap-and-trade policy; Corporate social responsibility; Sustainability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527319303640
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:proeco:v:223:y:2020:i:c:s0925527319303640

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107537

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Production Economics is currently edited by Stefan Minner

More articles in International Journal of Production Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().