EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Popularity shocks and political selection

Francisco Cavalcanti (), Gianmarco Daniele and Sergio Galletta ()

Journal of Public Economics, 2018, vol. 165, issue C, 201-216

Abstract: We observe that popularity shocks are crucial for electoral accountability beyond their effects on voters' behaviors. By focusing on Brazilian politics, we show that the disclosure of audit reports on the (mis)use of federal funds by local administrators affects the type of candidates who stand for election. When the audit finds low levels of corruption, the parties supporting the incumbent select less-educated candidates. On the contrary, parties pick more-educated candidates when the audit reveals a high level of corruption. These effects are stronger in municipalities that have easier access to local media.

Keywords: Political selection; Corruption; Competence; Local election; Political parties (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D70 D72 D73 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272718301361
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Popularity shocks and political selection (2018) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:165:y:2018:i:c:p:201-216

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Public Economics is currently edited by R. Boadway and J. Poterba

More articles in Journal of Public Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().

 
Page updated 2019-09-14
Handle: RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:165:y:2018:i:c:p:201-216