A theory of employment guarantees: Contestability, credibility and distributional concerns
Arnab Basu,
Nancy Chau and
Ravi Kanbur
Journal of Public Economics, 2009, vol. 93, issue 3-4, 482-497
Abstract:
Both raw intuition and past experience suggest that the success of an employment guarantee scheme (EGS) in safeguarding the welfare of the poor depends both on the wage it promises, and the ease with which any worker can gain access. An EGS is thus at once a wage guarantee and a rationing device. We chart the positive and normative limits of such an EGS as an efficiency improving and poverty alleviating policy reform in a canonical labor market setting. At its core, an EGS provides an aggregate, not just EGS, employment target. Given the target, the EGS wage and access can be fine-tuned to deliver outcomes ranging from a contestable labor market to a simple universal unemployment benefit. The credibility of any such target, however, is shown to be triggered endogenously by a host of factors: the distributional concerns of the planner, private sector productivity, the prevalence of market power and the need for public works. Paradoxically, the outcome with a planner who cares only about efficiency can be less efficient than the outcome with a planner whose social welfare function also gives weight to poverty!
Keywords: Employment; guarantees; Employment; targeting; Credibility; Distributional; concern (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (54)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-2727(08)00136-9
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: A Theory of Employment Guarantees: Contestability, Credibility and Distributional Concerns (2007) 
Working Paper: A Theory of Employment Guarantees: Contestability, Credibility and Distributional Concerns (2006) 
Working Paper: A Theory of Employment Guarantees: Contestability, Credibility and Distributional Concerns (2006) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:93:y:2009:i:3-4:p:482-497
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Public Economics is currently edited by R. Boadway and J. Poterba
More articles in Journal of Public Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().