EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Asymmetric cross-price effects and collusion

Luca Savorelli ()

Research in Economics, 2012, vol. 66, issue 4, 375-382

Abstract: Asymmetries in cross-price elasticities have been demonstrated by several empirical studies, but received little attention by the theoretical literature. In this paper we study from a theoretical stance how introducing asymmetry in the substitution effects influences the sustainability of collusion. We first characterize the equilibrium of a linear Cournot duopoly with substitute goods, and consider substitution effects which are asymmetric in magnitude. Since the two goods are asymmetric strategic substitutes, the production decisions are driven by the firm which is relatively less influenced by the rival. We then study partial collusion using the folk theorem's solution concept. Our main result shows that the interval of quantities supporting collusion in the asymmetric setting is always smaller than the interval in the symmetric benchmark. The asymmetry in the substitution effects thus hinders collusion.

Keywords: Asymmetry; Substitutes; Cournot duopoly; Collusion; Folk theorem (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090944312000324
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:reecon:v:66:y:2012:i:4:p:375-382

DOI: 10.1016/j.rie.2012.05.003

Access Statistics for this article

Research in Economics is currently edited by Federico Etro

More articles in Research in Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:eee:reecon:v:66:y:2012:i:4:p:375-382