Do local governments use business tax incentives to compensate for high business property taxes?
Richard Funderburg (),
David Merriman and
Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2020, vol. 81, issue C
Why do municipalities set business property taxes higher than the costs of business services when, in competitive markets, this would result in the inefficient provision of public goods? Statutory tax rates may be set artificially high to allow selective reductions for targeted firms through incentives. We examine the nearly 2500 tax codes—sub-municipal geographic areas—that host business locations in 134 municipalities in Cook County, Illinois. We explain spatial variation in tax incentives as a function of the relative competitiveness of tax codes. Our findings suggest that municipalities apply property tax abatements to offset their own relatively uncompetitive tax rates but use Tax Increment Financing (TIF) incentives to engage in vertical competition in order to capture revenue from overlapping governments.
JEL-codes: H25 H7 R38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:regeco:v:81:y:2020:i:c:s0166046219300316
Access Statistics for this article
Regional Science and Urban Economics is currently edited by D.P McMillen and Y. Zenou
More articles in Regional Science and Urban Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nithya Sathishkumar ().