Life cycle assessment of the solar thermal power plant integrated with air-cooled supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle

Tingyu Xiao, Chao Liu, Xurong Wang, Shukun Wang, Xiaoxiao Xu, Qibin Li and Xiaoxiao Li

Renewable Energy, 2022, vol. 182, issue C, 119-133

Abstract: Supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) Brayton cycle offers the potential of higher thermal efficiency and lower costs of electricity generation for concentrated solar power (CSP) applications. Besides its economic potential, the environmental sustainability needs to be examined. For this purpose, detailed life cycle assessment (LCA) of the solar driven sCO2 power generation system is carried out. The pollutant emissions and primary energy consumptions of the CSP plant with two typical sCO2 Brayton cycles including simple recuperative cycle and recompression cycle are analyzed and compared. Global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), respiratory effects potential (REP) are obtained. The life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of parabolic trough (PT) plant with sCO2 cycle and steam Rankine cycle are compared. Finally, uncertainty analysis is carried out to study the effect of environmental factors (solar irradiation and ambient temperature) and parameter design of the PT system (turbine inlet temperature, life span and thermal energy storage (TES) capacity) on the LCA results and ensure the reliable comparison. It is found that for the PT plant with sCO2 power cycle, the auxiliary electricity consumption from the grid, TES and solar field manufacture account for 92% of the total environmental impact and 98% of the total energy consumption, while sCO2 power cycle only accounts for a small part. The environmental performance of the recompression layout is better than that of the simple recuperative layout. For the CSP application, the GHG emissions of the sCO2 cycle are 21%∼41% less than that of the steam Rankine cycle.

Keywords: Concentrating solar power; Supercritical carbon dioxide brayton cycle; Different layouts; Life cycle assessment; Uncertainty analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148121014567
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:renene:v:182:y:2022:i:c:p:119-133

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.001

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable Energy is currently edited by Soteris A. Kalogirou and Paul Christodoulides

More articles in Renewable Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().