EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparison of the experimental and numerical results of coaxial-type and U-type deep-buried pipes’ heat transfer performances

Chao Li, Chao Jiang, Yanling Guan, Hao Chen, Ruitao Yang, Rong Wan and Lu Shen

Renewable Energy, 2023, vol. 210, issue C, 95-106

Abstract: The ground heat exchanger (GHE) is one of the main forms of geothermal energy utilization in middle-deep strata and typically includes coaxial-type deep-buried GHE (C-DGHE) and U-type deep-buried GHE (U-DGHE). This study compares the heat transfer characteristics of C-DGHE and U-DGHE. A field experiment was carried out on C-DGHE and U-DGHE at 2539 and 2781 m depths, respectively, in a housing estate in Xi'an. Simultaneously, the full-scale numerical models of both C-DGHE and U-DGHE at 2781 m were established based on the field logging data. A short-term experiment (72 h) and a long-term heat transfer simulation (five heating periods) serve to comprehensively compare the heat transfer performances of the two deep-buried pipe types. Results demonstrate that the heat transfer amount per unit meter of C-DGHE and U-DGHE were 132.18–145.91 W/m and 111.15–140.76 W/m respectively in this study, which means C-DGHE is superior to U-DGHE under similar boundary conditions when only heat transfer in buried pipes is considered. However, when heat transfer in buried pipes and water pump power consumption are considered simultaneously, a critical G (GC was ∼8.63 kg/s in this study) makes the comprehensive heat transfer performance of U-DGHE better than that of C-DGHE.

Keywords: Deep-buried pipe; Coaxial-type; U-type; Experimental investigation; Numerical investigation; Long-term operation characteristics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148123004962
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:renene:v:210:y:2023:i:c:p:95-106

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.04.046

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable Energy is currently edited by Soteris A. Kalogirou and Paul Christodoulides

More articles in Renewable Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:210:y:2023:i:c:p:95-106