Simultaneous optimization of electric production, azo dye, and yeast wastewater treatment in microbial fuel cell: Selection of the most suitable optimal conditions by PROMETHEE
Elif Durna Pişkin,
Nevim Genç and
Ramiz Gültekin Akay
Renewable Energy, 2024, vol. 237, issue PC
Abstract:
Microbial fuel cell is a clean technology in which waste treatment and energy production continue simultaneously. Process performance depends on the independent variables and their interaction with each other specific to the waste to be treated. In this study, Microbial Fuel Cell (MFC), in which yeast production process wastewater is oxidized in the anolyte, and azo dye is reduced in the catholyte under abiotic conditions, was optimized using the Response Surface Methodology for maximum waste treatment and energy production. The independent variables were wastewater type, electrode array, and amount of sulfate-reducing inhibitor, while the dependent variables were azo dye removal, maximum power density, chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal, and coulomb efficiency. The effect of variables on all responses was determined using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and 3-dimensional (3D) graphs. The suitability of the models was tested by verification experiments under the determined optimum conditions (OPT 1, 2 and 3). Optimum experiments were ranked with the PROMETHEE approach according to azo dye removal (mg/L), maximum power density (mW/m2), COD removal (g/L), coulombic efficiency (%), and electrode cost (€/m2) criteria. The preference order of the optimum experiments was determined as OPT 1>OPT 2>OPT 3. With OPT 1, azo dye removal of 16.8 mg/L, maximum power density of 95.34 mW/m2, COD removal of 5.8 g/L and coulombic efficiency of 0.23 % were achieved. With a 1000 Ω external resistor, the maximum power density and coulombic efficiency increased to 147 mW/m2 and 1.5 %, respectively. In addition, the determined optimum experiments were examined using polarization curve and Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy.
Keywords: Azo dye; Baker's yeast wastewater; Electrochemical analysis; Microbial fuel cell; PROMETHEE approach; Response surface methodolgy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124018299
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:renene:v:237:y:2024:i:pc:s0960148124018299
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.121761
Access Statistics for this article
Renewable Energy is currently edited by Soteris A. Kalogirou and Paul Christodoulides
More articles in Renewable Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().