Energy balances and greenhouse gas-mitigation potentials of bioenergy cropping systems (Miscanthus, rapeseed, and maize) based on farming conditions in Western Germany

Daniel Felten, Norbert Fröba, Jérôme Fries and Christoph Emmerling

Renewable Energy, 2013, vol. 55, issue C, 160-174

Abstract: Biomass for bioenergy is an important option within global change mitigation policies. The present research focused on energy net production, net reduction of greenhouse gases (GHG) (considered as CO2-equivalents), and energy output:input ratio of the energy cropping systems ‘rapeseed’, ‘maize’, and ‘Miscanthus’. The system-specific main products were biodiesel (rapeseed), electricity from biogas (maize), and Miscanthus chips (loose, chopped material); the related substituted fossil resources were diesel fuel (rapeseed), electricity from the German energy mix (maize), and heating oil (Miscanthus). However, research did not aim for a direct quantitative comparison of the crops. The study followed a case study approach with averaged data from commercial farms within an enclosed agricultural area (<5 km²) in Western Germany. Cultivation techniques were considered as communicated by farmers and operation managers; the diesel fuel consumption of agricultural machinery was modeled using an online-based calculator of the German Association for Technology and Structures in Agriculture (KTBL). Overall, rounded net energy production amounted to 66 GJ ha−1 (rapeseed), 91 GJ ha−1 (maize), and 254 GJ ha−1 yr−1 (Miscanthus); the related energy output:input ratios were 4.7 (rapeseed), 5.5 (maize), and 47.3 (Miscanthus), respectively. Compared to the respective fossil fuel-related energy supply, CO2-equivalent reduction potential ranged between 30 and 76% for electrical energy from maize biomass, 29–82% for biodiesel from rapeseed, and 96–117% for Miscanthus chips, depending on whether or not the accruing by-products rapeseed cake, glycerin (rapeseed cropping system), and waste heat (maize) were considered. True ‘CO2-neutrality’ was only reached by the Miscanthus cropping system and was related to an additional credit from carbon sequestration in soil during the cultivation period; thus, this cropping system could be attributed to be a CO2-sink.

Keywords: Life cycle assessment (LCA); CO2-neutral; C-sequestration; Sustainability; Energy efficiency; GHG (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148112007598
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:renene:v:55:y:2013:i:c:p:160-174

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.12.004

Access Statistics for this article

Renewable Energy is currently edited by Soteris A. Kalogirou and Paul Christodoulides

More articles in Renewable Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().