Economics at your fingertips  

Close to you? Bias and precision in patent-based measures of technological proximity

Mary Benner and Joel Waldfogel ()

Research Policy, 2008, vol. 37, issue 9, 1556-1567

Abstract: Patent data have been widely used in research to characterize firms' locations in technological or knowledge space, as well as the proximities among firms. Researchers have measured firms' technological or knowledge proximities with a variety of measures based on patent data, including Euclidean distances (using the technological classifications listed on patents), and overlap in cited patents. Often research has employed only the first listed patent classification in measures of proximities. We explore the effects of using the first listed patent class as well as other methods to measure proximities. We point out that measures of proximity based on small numbers of patents are imprecisely measured random variables. Measures computed on samples with few patents or a single patent class generate both biased and imprecise measures of proximity. We discuss the implications of this for typical research questions employing measures of proximity, and explore the effects of larger sample sizes and coarser patent class breakdowns in mitigating these problems. Where possible, we suggest that researchers increase their sample sizes by aggregating years or using all of the listed patent classes on a patent, rather than just the first.

Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (35) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Close to You? Bias and Precision in Patent-Based Measures of Technological Proximity (2007) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

Research Policy is currently edited by M. Bell, B. Martin, W.E. Steinmueller, A. Arora, M. Callon, M. Kenney, S. Kuhlmann, Keun Lee and F. Murray

More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().

Page updated 2018-09-18
Handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:37:y:2008:i:9:p:1556-1567