How to play the "Names Game": Patent retrieval comparing different heuristics
Julio Raffo and
Stephane Lhuillery
Research Policy, 2009, vol. 38, issue 10, 1617-1627
Abstract:
Patent statistics represent a critical tool for scholars, statisticians and policy makers interested in innovation and intellectual property rights. Many analyses are based on heterogeneous methods delineating the inventors' or firms' patent portfolios without questioning the quality of the method employed. We assess different heuristics in order to provide a robust solution to automatically retrieve inventors in large patent datasets (PATSTAT). The solution we propose reduces the usual errors by 50% and casts doubts on the reliability of statistical indicators and micro-econometric results based on common matching procedures. Guidelines for researchers, TTOs, firms, venture capitalists and policy makers likely to implement a names game or to comment on results based on a names game are also provided.
Keywords: Patents; Inventors; Names; matching; algorithms; Indicators; PATSTAT (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (85)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048-7333(09)00152-8
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: How to play the “Names Game”: Patent retrieval comparing different heuristics (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:38:y:2009:i:10:p:1617-1627
Access Statistics for this article
Research Policy is currently edited by M. Bell, B. Martin, W.E. Steinmueller, A. Arora, M. Callon, M. Kenney, S. Kuhlmann, Keun Lee and F. Murray
More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().