Heterogeneous MNC subsidiaries and technological spillovers: Explaining positive and negative effects in India
Anabel Marin and
Subash Sasidharan
Research Policy, 2010, vol. 39, issue 9, 1227-1241
Abstract:
One of the most intriguing aspects of the recent empirical literature on FDI-related spillover effects is the increasing identification of mixed results. A few studies, particularly in advanced countries have found positive effects; however, a more common scenario in recent studies is the prevalence of insignificant or even negative effects. This is despite the fact that theory predicts substantial positive effects in association with a supposed technological superiority of MNCs relative to domestic firms, particularly in the context of less advanced countries. In this paper, by distinguishing subsidiaries according to their orientation to carry out creative vs. exploitation activities in the host economy, we are able to distinguish situations with positive and negative spillover effects, and we explain why they may be emerging. More specifically, we find that only subsidiaries that are oriented to technologically creative activities have a significantly positive effect in India. In contrast, subsidiaries oriented mostly to technologically exploitative activities generate negative effects in some circumstances. The implications for theory and policy are discussed.
Keywords: Technological; spillovers; MNCs; Emerging; economies; Subsidiaries; Heterogeneity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (47)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048-7333(10)00142-3
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Heterogeneous MNC Subsidiaries and Technological Spillovers: Explaining Positive and Negative Effects in India (2010) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:39:y:2010:i:9:p:1227-1241
Access Statistics for this article
Research Policy is currently edited by M. Bell, B. Martin, W.E. Steinmueller, A. Arora, M. Callon, M. Kenney, S. Kuhlmann, Keun Lee and F. Murray
More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().