The effectiveness of R&D subsidies: A meta-regression analysis of the evaluation literature

Chris Dimos () and Geoff Pugh

Research Policy, 2016, vol. 45, issue 4, 797-815

Abstract: Widespread and increasing public subsidy for research and development (R&D) has given rise to a large and growing number of evaluation studies. While economic theory identifies market failures that justify public support, theory also suggests reasons why returns might be disappointing. Similarly, the empirical literature investigated – 52 micro-level studies published since 2000 on either input or output R&D – reports a wide range of findings. The lack of conclusiveness both of theory and of the evaluation literature motivate this Meta-Regression Analysis (MRA). This study contributes to policy debate by identifying a representative subsidy effect: after controlling for publication selection bias and for a wide range of sample and study heterogeneities, MRA findings reject crowding out of private investment by public subsidy but reveal no evidence of substantial additionality. In addition, among the research practices explaining the heterogeneous effects reported in this literature, those related to the treatment of unobservable firm heterogeneity are particularly important.

Keywords: R&D subsidies; Evaluation; Meta-regression analysis; Publication bias; Additionality; Crowding out (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (175)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733316000032
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:45:y:2016:i:4:p:797-815

DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.002

Access Statistics for this article

Research Policy is currently edited by M. Bell, B. Martin, W.E. Steinmueller, A. Arora, M. Callon, M. Kenney, S. Kuhlmann, Keun Lee and F. Murray

More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().