Varieties of scientific knowledge and their contributions to dealing with policy problems: A response to Richard Nelson’s “The sciences are different and the differences matter”

Richard Whitley

Research Policy, 2016, vol. 45, issue 9, 1702-1707

Abstract: The substantial differences between the kind of knowledge characteristic of classical mechanics and that found in much 20th century physics, biology and the human sciences have made the belief that there is a single model of scientific knowledge best represented by Newtonian physics increasingly untenable. The more that sciences deal with phenomena that are complex in terms of their internal structures, are partially constituted by their connections to their contexts, and whose causally influential processes are subject to endogenous change, the more important it is to recognise the diversity of the kinds of knowledge they produce and their varied connections to material and social technologies. Theories and models that differ in their contextual independence, complexity of internal structures and specificity of causal processes contribute in different ways and under different conditions to the resolution of policy issues. Applying causal models of what worked in other situations to policy problems often fail because key contingencies not included in such models have changed and/or their success has itself altered actors’ perceptions and preferences.

Keywords: Model science; Arithmomorphic science; Configurational sciences; Causality; System closure; Abstraction; Types of knowledge and problem solving (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733316301019
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:45:y:2016:i:9:p:1702-1707

DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.004

Access Statistics for this article

Research Policy is currently edited by M. Bell, B. Martin, W.E. Steinmueller, A. Arora, M. Callon, M. Kenney, S. Kuhlmann, Keun Lee and F. Murray

More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().