Climbing the ladder of technological development
Sergio Petralia,
Pierre-Alexandre Balland and
Andrea Morrison
Research Policy, 2017, vol. 46, issue 5, 956-969
Abstract:
Despite being the main thriving force behind economic growth and industrial development, technological innovation remains highly concentrated on a handful of countries. It is therefore of a great interest to know how countries accumulate and develop their innovative capabilities, what kind of obstacles they need to overcome, and whether it is possible to identify opportunities to develop new areas of technological specialization. In this paper we analyze countries’ patterns of technological diversification and specialization along the development process. We provide evidence regarding the importance of existing technological capabilities and the relationship among technologies in shaping possible paths of technological development. We show that the likelihood of diversification is higher for those technologies that are related to countries’ existing profile of competences. Moreover, we show this effect to be stronger at earlier stages of development. Additionally, we show that countries tend to follow clear patterns of specialization along the development path, by moving towards more complex and valuable technologies.
Keywords: Technological change; Innovation; Technological complexity; Technological relatedness; Technological diversification; Technological specialisation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O10 O14 O30 O33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (100)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004873331730063X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Climbing the Ladder of Technological Development (2016) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:46:y:2017:i:5:p:956-969
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.012
Access Statistics for this article
Research Policy is currently edited by M. Bell, B. Martin, W.E. Steinmueller, A. Arora, M. Callon, M. Kenney, S. Kuhlmann, Keun Lee and F. Murray
More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().