Cheat or perish? A theory of scientific customs
Benoît Le Maux,
Sarah Necker and
Yvon Rocaboy
Research Policy, 2019, vol. 48, issue 9, -
Abstract:
Performance incentives have become increasingly important in academia. Evidence suggest that they increase not only researchers’ effort but also their cheating. We develop a principal–agent framework in which a research institution (principal) aims to reward scientific productivity considering the social benefit of research and the remuneration costs. Researchers (agents) take into account what others are doing. As a consequence, the introduction of performance incentives not only leads to fraudulent behavior in the short run, but may also deteriorate the scientific norm in the long run. In the face of these dynamics, the principal pursues two goals: to increase productivity (effort incentive policy) and to deal with fraud (anti-fraud policy). Several factors determine the optimal mix of policies: economic factors (researchers’ cost of providing high or low effort, the societal value of scientific knowledge and the societal costs of scientific misbehavior) and psychological factors (the evolution of norms over time). An important insight of our theory is that when research institutions seek to encourage the production of high quality research, they should also raise the salary for normal research to avoid misconduct.
Keywords: Contract theory; Economics of science; Scientific misbehavior; Social norms (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A11 A13 D86 K42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733319301064
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Cheat or perish? A theory of scientific customs (2019)
Working Paper: Cheat or Perish? A Theory of Scientific Customs (2016) 
Working Paper: Cheat or Perish? A Theory of Scientific Customs (2016) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:48:y:2019:i:9:20
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.05.001
Access Statistics for this article
Research Policy is currently edited by M. Bell, B. Martin, W.E. Steinmueller, A. Arora, M. Callon, M. Kenney, S. Kuhlmann, Keun Lee and F. Murray
More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().