Ambidexterity in government: The influence of different types of legitimacy on innovation

Caroline Nowacki and Ashby Monk

Research Policy, 2020, vol. 49, issue 1

Abstract: Using a comparative case study of four independent infrastructure agencies in Australia, this article explores how governments can use structural ambidexterity to innovate. Independent agencies can serve as exploration units, but their innovation needs to be integrated into the rest of government. Instead of relying on an executive team to do it, independent agencies can take on this role, but they need to become legitimate to several government actors to influence government processes. Legitimacy can come from regulations, practical value, moral values or cognitive frames. Relying on regulations solely reduces influence; but relying on cognitive legitimacy leads to losing one's ability to radically innovate. We conclude that leading both exploration and integration relies on the exploration unit employees’ practical and moral legitimacy to several actors, and their ability to maintain cognitive distance from other governmental units. However, we caution that such a balance is hard to sustain over the long run, leading many innovative agencies to appeal to cognitive legitimacy and revert to incremental innovation over time.

Keywords: Structural ambidexterity; Integration; Legitimacy; Policy innovation; Independent agencies; Infrastructure planning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004873331930160X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:49:y:2020:i:1:s004873331930160x

DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.103840

Access Statistics for this article

Research Policy is currently edited by M. Bell, B. Martin, W.E. Steinmueller, A. Arora, M. Callon, M. Kenney, S. Kuhlmann, Keun Lee and F. Murray

More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().