DYNAMIC FIT IN AN ERA OF FERMENT: PRODUCT DESIGN REALIGNMENT AND THE SURVIVAL-ENHANCING ROLE OF ALLIANCES AND ACQUISITIONS

Tuhin Chaturvedi and John E. Prescott

Research Policy, 2020, vol. 49, issue 6

Abstract: We propose that in an era of ferment, when a firm's product design does not possess the features of the evolving dominant design, it faces a feature implementation gap defined as 'the number of features of the evolving product dominant design that are absent from a firm's product design'. Employing the performance feedback perspective of the behavioral theory of the firm, we conceptualize a feature implementation gap as a manifestation of an aspiration-performance gap that negatively affects a firm's likelihood of product market survival due to a product market 'lock-out'. To dynamically improve the alignment of their product designs with the evolving dominant design and increase their likelihood of product market survival, we suggest that firms engage in problematic search using alliances and acquisitions to decrease the feature implementation gap. We found strong support for our predictions using a longitudinally dynamic mediation model with data from an era of ferment in the digital camera product market between 1997-2004. Our study extends the behavioral theory of the firm to a novel context - eras of ferment. It demonstrates that in this context, problemistic search involved dual search modes- short-run search at the individual feature level and long-run search at the design level. It also shows the utility of adopting a demand-side (i.e. product market or customer based) perspective to explain how firms improve their likelihood of product market survival during eras of ferment. In this, it complements recent research that has examined how firms’ internal actions affect product design realignment processes and firm outcomes in eras of ferment.

Keywords: Eras of ferment; Aspiration performance gap; Problemistic search; Alliances; Acquisitions; Product market survival (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004873332030069X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:49:y:2020:i:6:s004873332030069x

DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.103989

Access Statistics for this article

Research Policy is currently edited by M. Bell, B. Martin, W.E. Steinmueller, A. Arora, M. Callon, M. Kenney, S. Kuhlmann, Keun Lee and F. Murray

More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().