Exploring novel technologies through board interlocks: Spillover vs. broad exploration

Mingxiang Li

Research Policy, 2021, vol. 50, issue 9

Abstract: We draw upon insights from social networks and organizational learning to argue that board interlocks not only affect technological exploration (technological innovations that explore new technological domains) but also bring about different outcomes based on the various primary roles of the individuals creating them. We also advance the knowledge-spillover literature by arguing that interlocks are more influential in affecting spillover exploration (imitating technologies from interlocked firms) than in influencing broad exploration (exploring novel technologies beyond interlocked firms). Moreover, we predict that interlocks created by focal executives (or executive-created interlocks) affect spillover and broad exploration of the focal firm more strongly than those created by outside directors (or non-executive-created interlocks). We test these hypotheses by analyzing information from multiple resources, including historical records of board appointments and data on technological innovations by U.S. public companies. Empirical analyses provide some support for our hypotheses. Specifically, our findings suggest that an increased number of board interlocks improves the likelihood of technological exploration. Results also indicate that board interlocks are more influential in generating spillover exploration than broad exploration. Finally, empirical evidence reveals that executive-created interlocks are more important than non-executive-created interlocks in promoting spillover exploration.

Keywords: Technological exploration; Knowledge spillover; Board interlocks; Organizational learning; Technological innovation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733321001360
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:50:y:2021:i:9:s0048733321001360

DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104337

Access Statistics for this article

Research Policy is currently edited by M. Bell, B. Martin, W.E. Steinmueller, A. Arora, M. Callon, M. Kenney, S. Kuhlmann, Keun Lee and F. Murray

More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().