Knowledge complexity and the mechanisms of knowledge generation and exploitation: The European evidence

Cristiano Antonelli, Francesco Crespi and Francesco Quatraro

Research Policy, 2022, vol. 51, issue 8

Abstract: A knowledge complexity trade-off can be identified if and when the complexity of the stock of knowledge engenders positive effects in the recombinant generation of new technological knowledge but negative ones in its exploitation in terms of productivity gains. On the one hand, the complexity of the stock of knowledge increases the scope for recombination and hence the amount of knowledge that each firm is able to generate with a given budget. On the other, the complexity of the stock of knowledge has controversial effects on productivity: the indirect effects -via the larger amount of knowledge generated upstream- are positive but the direct ones can be negative if they generate difficulties in the exploitation of a highly heterogeneous stock of knowledge. The econometric test on the European regions in the years 1997–2009, provides strong empirical evidence about the relevance of the composition of the stock of quasi-public knowledge and its twin positive effects in terms of the direct support of the knowledge generation function and of the indirect one on productivity growth. Moreover, the analysis highlights the negative direct effects on productivity dynamics, though with substantial heterogeneity across different groups of regions.

Keywords: Knowledge composition; Knowledge complexity; Knowledge generation function; Knowledge exploitation; Technology production function; Knowledge complexity trade-off (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O31 O32 R11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733320301591
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:51:y:2022:i:8:s0048733320301591

DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104081

Access Statistics for this article

Research Policy is currently edited by M. Bell, B. Martin, W.E. Steinmueller, A. Arora, M. Callon, M. Kenney, S. Kuhlmann, Keun Lee and F. Murray

More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().