An identity perspective on the diffusion of user innovations in the household sector

Xin Yu and Jeroen P.J. de Jong

Research Policy, 2024, vol. 53, issue 4

Abstract: User innovations are widely present in the household sector, but often do not spread to others because users lack incentives to sell and/or share. Previous studies of what alleviates this diffusion problem were empirically driven, while a theoretical framework that integrally explains alleviating factors is missing. We fill this void by proposing an identity perspective based on users' eudaimonic motivation: diffusion efforts may be in line with users' aspired ‘daimon’ or true self. An identity perspective unites previously unconnected alleviating factors (commercial motivation, community involvement, common cause motivation) and enables theorizing about interaction effects. We identify three types of user innovator identity with potential relevance for diffusion: professional, community-oriented and societal. Survey data of 999 Chinese user innovators confirm that aspired professional identity is associated with sales effort, and community-oriented and societal identity with free sharing. Moreover, community-oriented and professional identity interact positively with selling effort. We conclude that an identity perspective enhances our understanding of the diffusion of user innovations to everyone's benefit.

Keywords: User innovation; Diffusion failure; Eudaimonic motivation; Identity perspective; Effort to sell; Free revealing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324000350
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:53:y:2024:i:4:s0048733324000350

DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2024.104986

Access Statistics for this article

Research Policy is currently edited by M. Bell, B. Martin, W.E. Steinmueller, A. Arora, M. Callon, M. Kenney, S. Kuhlmann, Keun Lee and F. Murray

More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().