Public interest v.s. special interest: The strategic framing tactics of technologies in the political arena

Yuni Wen

Research Policy, 2024, vol. 53, issue 8

Abstract: Although current scholarship has shown that firms strategically frame their new technologies to persuade market stakeholders, such as investors and customers, we know less about how they use strategic framing tactics to influence politicians when the new technology challenges the regulatory framework. This is a significant omission, given that market and political stakeholders have very different interests and legitimacy judgments. Therefore, this paper aims to systematically examine the variations and antecedents of framing tactics of technologies in the political arena. It distinguishes between two types of political framing tactics of technologies: public interest framing tactics, which align the technology with the interests of the public, and special interest framing tactics, which condemn the incumbents as representatives of a special interest that stifles innovation. It also suggests that technology firms' political framing tactics are influenced by the instrumental interests and ideologies of targeted politicians. Based on a keyword-based content analysis of Uber's political statements in the most populous US cities between 2012 and 2018, it finds that the use of public interest framing tactics is specifically related to politicians' electoral pressure, whereas the use of special interest framing tactics is associated with politicians' liberal tendencies.

Keywords: Strategic framing; Corporate political activities; Disruptive technologies; Uber (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324001203
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:53:y:2024:i:8:s0048733324001203

DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2024.105071

Access Statistics for this article

Research Policy is currently edited by M. Bell, B. Martin, W.E. Steinmueller, A. Arora, M. Callon, M. Kenney, S. Kuhlmann, Keun Lee and F. Murray

More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().