Mixed methods research in technology and innovation management (TIM): A review of three leading TIM journals and recommendations for moving forward
Taeyoung Park and
Jae-Yun Ho
Research Policy, 2025, vol. 54, issue 6
Abstract:
Mixed methods research is considered valuable for understanding the increasingly complex and disrupted nature of innovation, yet relevant methodological discussions are scarce in the field of technology and innovation management (TIM). To address this research gap, this study explores the current landscape of mixed methods research in the TIM field (including prevalence rate, rationales, research types, rigors, and challenges) by reviewing peer-reviewed articles published in three leading TIM journals and conducting interviews with their editors and selected authors. This study identifies a lower prevalence rate of mixed methods research than in other business disciplines despite its added value in the TIM field. This may be partly because of the additional challenges in research and publication (such as a lack of references for atypical research designs and more work required by the reviewing team), given the predominant engagement of TIM researchers in quantitative research. The study concludes by providing practical recommendations for the TIM research community to promote more mixed methods research. Most importantly, further research and methodological discussions are needed to support the education and training of experts using mixed methods, which can be facilitated by the current study.
Keywords: Mixed methods research; Technology and innovation management (TIM); Prevalence ratios; Research method (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004873332500085X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:54:y:2025:i:6:s004873332500085x
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2025.105256
Access Statistics for this article
Research Policy is currently edited by Anna Bergek, PhD, Alex Coad, PhD, Maryann Feldman, Elisa Giuliani, Adam B. Jaffe, Martin Kenney, Keun Lee, PhD, Ben Martin, MA, MSc, Kazuyuki Motohashi, Paul Nightingale, Ammon Salter, Maria Savona, Reinhilde Veugelers and John Walsh
More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().