 Does ESG rating divergence affect the disclosure behavior of key audit matters?Jiaojiao Li and Ying Zhang International Review of Economics & Finance, 2025, vol. 103, issue C Abstract: Divergent assessments of a firm's ESG performance by different rating agencies can amplify market perception gaps and create conflicts among stakeholder objectives. Against this backdrop, this study examines the economic consequences of ESG rating divergence from the perspective of auditors, using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2017 to 2023. The findings show that ESG rating divergence has a positive impact on the disclosure of Key Audit Matters (KAMs). Mechanism tests indicate that corporate digitalization and reputational risk partially mediate this relationship, revealing the channels through which ESG rating divergence influences KAM disclosure via digital transformation and reputation-driven factors. Heterogeneity analyses further demonstrate that the effects of ESG rating divergence on KAM disclosure vary significantly by asset intensity and industry characteristics. Compared to asset-intensive and non-manufacturing firms, manufacturing and non-asset-intensive firms place greater emphasis on standardized KAM disclosure. Keywords: ESG rating divergence; Key audit matters disclosure; Corporate digitalization; Corporate reputation (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:reveco:v:103:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025007543 DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.104591 Access Statistics for this article International Review of Economics & Finance is currently edited by H. Beladi and C. Chen More articles in International Review of Economics & Finance from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.