Mergers and capital flight in unionised oligopolies: Is there scope for a "national champion" policy?
Kjell Lommerud (),
Frode Meland and
Odd Rune Straume
International Review of Economics & Finance, 2011, vol. 20, issue 2, 325-341
Abstract:
Many policy makers seem to prefer domestic alternatives to cross-border mergers. We construct a model where cross-border mergers drive down union-set wages, domestic mergers have non-labour cost synergies and policy evaluators care more about workers than capital owners. Apparently, the stage is set for "national champion" policies to be sensible. However, we also introduce the possibility of capital flight by allowing a domestic firm to move production abroad. Restrictive cross-border merger policies can then seriously backfire, since they do not necessarily bring about a domestic merger -- but capital flight instead.
Keywords: Cross-border; merger; National; champions; Greenfield; FDI; Trade; unions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059-0560(10)00043-2
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Mergers and capital flight in unionised oligopolies: Is there scope for a 'national champion' policy? (2008) 
Working Paper: Mergers and capital flight in unionised oligopolies: Is there scope for a 'national champion' policy? (2008) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:reveco:v:20:y:2011:i:2:p:325-341
Access Statistics for this article
International Review of Economics & Finance is currently edited by H. Beladi and C. Chen
More articles in International Review of Economics & Finance from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().