 Does the central bank's intervention benefit trade balance? Empirical evidence from ChinaYu-Ming Hsiao, Sheng-Chieh Pan and Po-Chin Wu International Review of Economics & Finance, 2012, vol. 21, issue 1, 130-139 Abstract: This paper employs the intervention indices measured from the modified Weymark (1997) model and modified trade models to evaluate the role of China's intervention behavior in the trade balances with its four major trade partners. In our constructed trade models, the intervention effects comprise direct and interactive phases, and their overall effects are diverse. Empirical results show that intervention actions actually create the largest trade advantage for China in the China–Japan case followed by the China–US case creating the next largest trade advantage for China. However, the trade balance is worsened in the China-European Unit case and in the China–Taiwan case. Considering the J-curve effect and the negative interactive effect in the China-European Unit case, the rate of the Chinese renminbi against the euro is not an appropriate intervention object for China. Keywords: Intervention indices; Exchange market pressure; Generalized moment method; Trade model (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:reveco:v:21:y:2012:i:1:p:130-139 DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2011.05.006 Access Statistics for this article International Review of Economics & Finance is currently edited by H. Beladi and C. Chen More articles in International Review of Economics & Finance from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.